Feature Content Review (02/03/22)

1. This magazine is not only intended for environmental enthusiasts, including professional and hobbyist/enthusiast meteorologists, climate scientists, environmentalists, etc., but also has some features understandable by someone not as typically interested in atmospheric behavior, such as long-term forecasts, and major news accounts, therefore being appealing to those who want to learn.

2. The news articles would be interesting and obscure enough to teach nearly everyone reading it something new, but also written to be accessible and interesting for someone uninformed on the topics without it being painful to read through if one has that knowledge. All articles will encourage learning due to their high amounts of informational content, and need to be ambitious enough to ensure that information is worth interest and time despite the intended audience.

3. Given the diverse specific fields and interests of this magazine's projected audience, it's hard to say which one will be their favorite. This can depend on quality, aesthetic, topic, and how well those elements compliment each other. Given this criteria for appeal, I think an article on Space Weather might be a better candidate for an overall favorite than talking about the El Reno tornado like nearly everyone interested in tornadoes probably has, or discussing public versus private weather data due to a comparative lack of information.

4. I would remove "The Drier Side" and "Tornado Activity Falls Below 30-Year Average" because there's not a realistically large amount of unknown and intriguing material that could comprise full-length articles about basic non-weather events and an easily summarized statistic. There are likely more in-depth and colorful reasons to write about the weather that might occur soon, but these would be relatively uninspired for articles, let alone featured material.